Appeal Following Excommunication or Secret Name Removal

President Paul Martin,
*********
*********
*********
*******
****

8th November 2015

Dear Paul,

Re: Excommunication, or Name Removal without express permission

There seems to have been some lies told in your behalf.

I’ve just heard this week via my parents that I’ve had my name removed from the records of the Church. Bishop Nelson Oliver visited my parents specifically to tell them the news of my ‘Name Removal.’

Now, either this is a big clerical error, or multiple lies are being told about me and my membership status in the Church.

I know from my time serving as bishop that clear policy rules are set in place to protect a member’s membership status.   A member’s name is only removed from the records of the Church by adhering to a strict set of rules, following a clear and unequivocal request for name removal originated by the member themselves. Never is it allowed for the Church leader to initiate that process independently. I recall the General Handbook of Instructions stating categorically that Bishops and Stake Presidents were not allowed to ask members to resign, nor to use name removal as a way to avoid Disciplinary Procedures where serious transgressions are involved.

I have clearly stated on multiple occasions, verbally and in writing, that I did not want my name removed from Church records following your requests for me to do so.

Yet I now hear from my parents that it has happened despite my desires to the contrary. And when checking the online membership records for confirmation the Church website says “You have stated that you are not a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” This is a blatant lie!

The other possibility is that this so-called Name Removal is in fact excommunication. Having received a hand-delivered written letter from you inviting me to meet to consider “whether you should remain a member of the Church.” I asked Bishop Nelson Oliver, who delivered the letter, specifically if this was a Disciplinary Council. To which he replied very clearly with, “No. It is a meeting to discuss your membership in the Church.”

From the Bishop’s reply I was reassured that this meeting was not a Disciplinary Council. The Church’s own General Handbook of Instructions specifically states those words should be used when inviting a member to such an important meeting and as they were not used I was satisfied it was only a discussion.

Nevertheless I went to the trouble of writing to you to acknowledge receipt, stating that I consider your continued behaviour to be harassment, and if it continued I would report you to the Devon & Cornwall Constabulary for Religious Hate Crime. Which I did.

In that letter dated 14th October 2015 I reiterated very clearly my intention to remain as a member of the Church.

I have not received written confirmation of any decision taken with regards to my membership, which, if a decision was made, is very irregular and does not follow Church policy. 

In view of these queries I need answers:

1. Were Disciplinary Proceedings carried out on the 18th of October 2015 despite lies to the contrary.

Or-

2. Has my name been removed from the Records of The Church despite my stating this should not happen.

3. Further, I need to see minutes of the meeting held on the 18th October 2015 where you considered my membership. I also need the names of everyone in attendance at that meeting, as I will be asking each of them if they were aware of the purpose and type of meeting they were participating in. I do this in accordance with regulations about personal information under the Data Protection Act 1998 

4. And I wish to lodge an official Appeal to The First Presidency about these proceedings and my membership status, as they ultimately hold the Keys of Membership in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

I firmly request that the First Presidency overturn the decision made about my Church membership.

Please forward me with a copy of your correspondence to the First Presidency, including any ‘Report of Church Disciplinary Action’ forms and other relevant documents, by Friday 13th November at the latest.

As you read this the media are being informed and I’ve been assured by them that they wish to follow the outcome.

Yours faithfully, 
Stephen C Bloor

This entry was posted in Mormon Issues, TRUTH and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Appeal Following Excommunication or Secret Name Removal

  1. Pingback: Former Mormon Bishop of Helston may have been secretly excommunicated for speaking publicly about issues in the Church | Steve Bloor's Blog

  2. joan barnes says:

    Thank you for all you share and for raising awareness to those who are people of integrity and truth seekers. We need to encourage people to speak the truth and not be bullied by the church leaders who clearly are not men of truth or integrity or compassion. I am apalled by the way people have been treated when they realise they have been lied to for years. Its devastating enough to find this out without having to endure rejection and coldness from the leadership that purport to LOVE YOU, well they say this from the pulpit but it only means they love you as long a you dont ask questions and u support them. This is not the lords church, i doubt there is one. Jesus taught us who we are in my opinion and its up to us to choose from our own internal understanding how to live our lives, not by mans interpretation of the bible or what they choose to make up to keep people in control goodness and good living comes from our individual souls.

  3. A very dignified and appropriate response to their ‘unauthorised’ behaviour.

  4. Edy Meredith says:

    I would suggest that you praise God that you are out from under the great pyramid scheme of the mormon church’s philosophy: work hard all your life for the mormon church and you might, maybe, qualify to be a god-let.

  5. Your hurt calls me out. When it comes to religion no one has authority over you for anything without your compliance. Being raised in the church literally means you were raised to be compliant. It is all about what you believe. Continue to live believing a church has authority over you or find new beliefs. It is a total transformation. My advise: Seek out ex-Mormons who have been where you are. Ask them to share their stories with you. Make new friends free of religion. Can’t hurt.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s